
The first Making Tax Digital quarterly update is due by 7 August 2026, covering income and expenses from 6 April to 5 July. There is a soft landing: no penalty points for late quarterly updates in 2026/27. And that soft landing is being widely misread — by clients, and by some of the coverage — as "the first year doesn't really count." It counts. Here is what the update actually requires, what the soft landing does and doesn't cover, and what firms should treat as the real job of quarter one.
Less than most clients fear. A quarterly update is a cumulative summary of income and expenses for the tax year so far, submitted through MTD-compatible software. Category totals — sales, expenses by type — for 6 April to 5 July. No accounting adjustments, no reliefs, no tax calculation, no payment. The tax itself is still settled at the Final Declaration, due 31 January 2028 for the 2026/27 year, and the payment dates haven't moved.
The multiplication is where the work hides: a separate update is required for each trade and each property business, so a client with two trades and a rental files three updates by the same date. (We've mapped that arithmetic in the MTD maths on firm capacity.)
One thing, precisely: no penalty points for late quarterly updates in the 2026/27 tax year. It is worth being equally precise about what it does not cover:
Put those together and the soft landing reads very differently: HMRC has removed the penalty for lateness in the one year when lateness teaches the most expensive lesson. A client who files late in 2026/27 loses nothing on paper — and walks into April 2027, where each missed deadline earns a point and four points triggers a £200 penalty, with the same untested process and one more income stream in scope.
One point per missed deadline — and it is per deadline, not per income stream, so a client late on all three of their updates on the same date collects one point, not three. At four points, HMRC charges £200, and every further late submission while at the threshold triggers another £200. Points fall away only after a sustained period of on-time filing. It is a regime designed to be survivable for the occasionally late and expensive for the habitually late — which is exactly why the habit formed this year is the thing that matters.
Not perfect numbers — the cumulative design forgives those. The real job is proving the loop works: records requested and received, categorised digitally, filed through software, client informed — once per income stream, on a date the calendar owns rather than a person remembers. Firms that treat Q1 as a rehearsal run with real stakes come out of the soft-landing year with a process; firms that treat it as a year off come out with the same January-style scramble, now scheduled four times a year and newly attached to a points meter.
The record-keeping is where that succeeds or fails. Every update rests on the same evidence chain — the client's records in, the categorised digital record, the submitted figures, and the trail showing what was sent and approved. When that chain lives in one place per client, the quarterly cycle is administration; when it lives across inboxes and drives, it is archaeology, quarterly. It's the same discipline that makes working papers defensible, applied at four times the frequency — and it's where a system like Workiro, which files client records, requests and approvals against the client automatically, converts the multiplied diary back into a routine.
The clients who'll thank you in 2028 are the ones whose first Final Declaration is a formality because four clean quarters already exist behind it. To see a full quarterly evidence loop run end to end, book a demo.